Evidence Board
Source-cited investigations · Every claim links to its record
Investigation · Updated6 Oct 2026
The Epstein Network
Source-cited map of Jeffrey Epstein’s associations, travel and finances, with a focus on his documented ties to Donald Trump.
More boards
Investigation1 Oct 2026
Watergate: from the break-in to the resignation (1972–1974)
A sample board. How a burglary at the Democratic National Committee led to the resignation of a president, rebuilt from court records, White House tapes and congressional reports, starting from the Slow Burn podcast (Slate, 2017).
How we handle evidence
Every statement on a board is a claim tied to one source, with the quote and the page it comes from. Each claim carries one of five labels. A connection shows its strongest claim; a path is only as strong as its weakest link.
- Documented
Documented: The primary record states it directly.
- Reported
Reported: Credible reporting; underlying record not reached.
- Alleged
Alleged: An accusation — testimony, complaint, deposition.
- Disputed
Disputed: A denial or contradicting record exists.
- Inferred
Inferred: Our analysis connecting other claims.
Protected individual
Victims and anyone who was a minor are never named. They appear only as a redaction bar, claims about them are withheld, and their names are scrubbed from every public text. Private individuals are named only when every claim about them is documented in a primary record. Presence in a record is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Follow the investigation
Case journalAfter every session
Each research session ends with a written report: what was found, what led nowhere, and the open leads for next time.
Read the journalCorrectionsAlways open
Spotted an error or know a record we should check? Corrections are handled in the next session and noted in its journal entry.
Suggest a lead